LOVE FACTS IN HUMAN LIFE

Key of posts

• 1.WHAT IS LOVE
• 2.WHO CAN LOVE
• 3.WHY WE LOVE
• 4.WHERE PRESENT LOVE
• 5.WHAT GOOD EFFECT OF LOVE
• 6.WHAT IS BENET OF LOVE
• 7.WHOSE VISION OF LOVE
• 8.HOW MANY PERSIAN LOVE

1.WHAT IS LOVE

Love is a complex group of emotions, behaviors, and beliefs associated with strong feelings of affection, protectiveness, warmth, and respect for another person. For example, anyone might say he or she loves his or her dog, loves freedom, or loves God.

2.WHO CAN LOVE

young and old the desire for companionship and love remains or they do marriage can symbolize more than loving commitment often conferring legal and social privileges. Love flourishes despite Iran's strict social and religious codes which restrict the behavior of men and women in public or you about love the helplessness of a newborn child inspires a protective instinct in another.

3.WHY WE LOVE

Specifically, to enable love for men and women to court and win a preferred mating partner. I think gender differences. Male subjects showed more activity in a brain region associated with large visual love this. but you attract naturally to someone which you find nearest live pet love and any things which you used log time you have some love him.

4.WHERE PRESENT LOVE

I think this statement may surprise to some people, who believe that breaking the marriage contravenes some divine law. Is it not true that most monotheistic religions, and this includes the Catholic, are contrary to divorce? one who asks to the human being that their marriage is for a lifetime, so that the person believes that with the suffering generated by the relationship without love is “winning the sky”. However, this is not true. There is not any spiritual advancement in the person who gives up living according to their feelings, because it is not God who forces him or her, but is the personal self or the social or religious norms professed the ones forcing him/her. It should be clear that it is neither God nor a higher spirituality the ones requiring it, but the laws of men impregnated by selfishness, who trade with everything, even with feelings.

5.WHAT GOOD EFFECT OF LOVE

Let’s return to the theme of the reasons that make a couple continue their relationship despite not to be in love. There are persons who fear for material helplessness if they leave their partner, and they continue with him/her because this guarantees them a house and a livelihood. What do you have to say about these cases? They are a reflection of that in reality it is a union where material convenience predominates. If at the beginning it was not the main reason for the union, it is now the extent of it. These people will have to decide what they value more, whether their freedom of feeling or their safety and comfort. If they choose to continue the relationship for those reasons, surely, they will lack nothing materially, but they will lack everything emotionally, because they live without love. If they are materialistic people who value feelings just a little, they will choose to continue the relationship. If they are the kind of people who above all want to be happy, they will overcome their fears and even having to start from zero materially speaking, they will do it happily because they will have recovered their freedom of feeling.

6.WHAT IS BENET OF LOVE

Another of the arguments of many people who have children as a fruit of that relationship is that they do not separate for protecting their children. They say they prefer holding themselves in the relationship at least until the children arrive to adulthood. They consider to act correctly, for the love toward their children, since they give precedence to their children’s happiness before their own. They consider that a breach of the couple or marriage can cause a strong emotional trauma to the children and they prefer to avoid it. Are they right?

7.WHOSE VISION OF LOVE

But for the child the break in the relationship of parents is a radical change in his/her life. Isn’t it true that many children live their parents’ separation in a traumatic way? When the child is small the rupture itself does not cause any kind of emotional trauma, since the child does not have enough knowledge for the constraints of education to have permeated in him or her. The changes that will occur in his/her life, if the contact continues existing with both parents and they continue manifesting the love they feel for him/her, even being apart, he/she will live them as a game.

8.HOW MANY PERSIAN LOVE

Summing up everything we have discussed up to now, I get the feeling that the message transmitted of love in a couple is a love of greater importance than the fraternal or filial one. Isn’t it selfish to make a distinction between love of partners and fraternal or filial love? Isn’t this distinction contradicting the concept of unconditional love? What is your basis to say that? I suppose like in the example given by Jesus. He was not doing special references about the love of partners, was he? You cannot know that, because you are basing it on the information of the canon gospels that reflect very little of what he said. But I tell you that he also spoke of the love of couples, above all to those closest, who had more ability to understand. He already left them the teaching that only mutual love and perfect affinity is the bond that unites couples, and that the decision of the union and the separation of a couple should be taken by each one of them in total freedom. This that I tell you now does not seem anything unusual, because it is reasonable for any moderately sane mindset. But at that time the mentality of the human being was poorer in understanding and the respect for freedom of feeling was practically nil. Polygamy was frequent and the majority of unions were without love, arranged marriages in which either one of the partners or both was obligated to get married without having in mind their will.